I have received an invitation to upgrade my Snapmaker 2.0 A250/A350 (50% off). I purchased the 3D printing module, linear module (bundle), and power module set on October 20. The air purifier is out of the question, but the announced rotary module and emergency stop button followed by the announce…

Read from here to get an idea why most of us are quite sure that torque and resolution will be less than with the old modules. Resolution might be improved again by microstepping, but as brent113 wrote: It’s not anything significant - the new (worse) resolution is still more than enough. On print sp…

@Hauke yeah, I never said it didn’t have less, we just don’t know how much of a difference it is, but there is no doubt a change.

[image] Hauke: On print speed I might disagree with brent113, an increase will come in handy with large objects I avoided posting this previously, but #yolo. This is purely discussing liner module speed and assuming this would be used for travel or other non-extrusion, non-laser burning, non-…

100% agreed and sound math! Still, I’m coming from a different angle. If I want to stay in the recommended operational parameters (e.g. for warranty or out of carefulness), the Snapmaker pages state that you should not go beyond 60-80 mm/s. If I assume that this goes up by the acclaimed 50%, we get …

[image] Hauke: If I want to stay in the recommended operational parameters (e.g. for warranty or out of carefulness), the Snapmaker pages state that you should not go beyond 60-80 mm/s. If I assume that this goes up by the acclaimed 50%, we get at 90-120 mm/s “allowed” - and I guess if we plug i…

[image] brent113: First, I believe the recommended values you are citing in the range of 60-80mm/s to be based on 3D printing and other typical maximum work speeds. That is limited by the process parameters and of no relation to the linear modules. I tried to point this out on another post bu…

[image] brent113: First, I believe the recommended values you are citing in the range of 60-80mm/s to be based on 3D printing and other typical maximum work speeds. That is limited by the process parameters and of no relation to the linear modules. Here is a citation from Snapmaker staff, of wh…

[image] Hauke: 60 mm/s while printing, 80 mm/s travel (which never made sense to me anyhow - why should I not print with 80 mm/s if travel is OK?) Off topic here, so this will be brief - Why not print at 80mm/s? If you can get good quality prints on a machine at 80mm/s there’s no reason you…

On 1: With my old CoreXY printer (Fabtotum) I’ve been printing a lot with 120 mm/s (PLA), and for anything not in high demand for mechanical robustness, layer adhesion was more than sufficient even at these high speeds. But I admit that with 60 mm/s it is better. On 2: Never had this problem actuall…

[image] brent113: For the v2 modules: […] a = 1000mm/sec2 This is a best-case assumption, that the acceleration is as high as the v1 module. It may not be. This is a kinematic analysis that doesn’t take into account dynamics, particularly the available power in the stepper and the principal l…

Snapmaker 2.0 Upgrade

Snapmaker 2.0 (3-in-1)

Hauke October 29, 2021, 9:39am 28

@Tczerny Read the last section of the first post in this thread.

Topic		Replies	Views
What you think about the new products / upgrades today? Snapmaker 2.0 (3-in-1)	156	5381	June 13, 2023
Power Module / 3D Printer Module /Linear Module Snapmaker 2.0 (3-in-1)	35	3373	January 1, 2022
We haven’t forgotten 2.0 owners! Provide some thoughts on the backward compatibility of Artisan Artisan (3-in-1)	78	9188	July 23, 2024
Public Roadmap a Deadend? Snapmaker 2.0 (3-in-1)	22	2044	November 17, 2021
New Snapmaker 2's? Diverging? Snapmaker 2.0 (3-in-1)	30	2235	October 22, 2021

Snapmaker 2.0 Upgrade

Related topics