I opened a technical support ticket with Snapmaker. They suggested that I install the original bed with the magnetic pad, then complete the calibration then use the manual calibration procedure for the glass bed. That was in fact my first thought, however I wanted to get a better understanding of the details involved.
Well, after I reverted to the original be setup, the calibration still fails!-(
I noticed that there is a foot in the middle and behind of the two nozzles on the bottom of the Dual Extrusion Module. The foot does not touch the bed during the initial calibration attempt (just before the failure) using the original bed configuration. When the glass bed was installed, the foot was landing on the glass retaining fixture at the left front corner of the bed, which is probably why its calibration failed.
Just after the printer boots, it asks if the quick swap kit is installed, which I have been responding with “No” except for one time, I responded “Yes”. I wanted to see if this changed the bed height calibration detection. This does appear to be the case.
I’m concerned that a nozzle could break the glass during an automated calibration, therefore I do not want to try another glass bed calibration unless I get some assurance.
My glass bed does not have a magnetic sticker. I would like to know more about why it is required, how to obtain a magnetic sticker, and how it is installed.
I did read your Issue #285 article, then reviewed the github snapmaker2-Controller (GitHub - Snapmaker/Snapmaker2-Controller: Snapmaker2-Controller is the firmware for Snapmaker 2.0 3-in-1 3D Printers.) information. I really do not want to compile and load printer firmware code to correct a problem that needs to be resolved by Snapmaker.
With the original extruder module using the glass bed, I would do a manual calibration when required. I’m ok with that. If I can get it to where: I can use the Dual Extruder Module (with a glass bed) and an automated calibration, that would be fantastic.