# 10W laser on anodized aluminum with Luban 4.11 blurred edges

**URL:** <https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523>\
**Category:** Maker Creations\
**Tags:** Laser\
**Created:** [April 6, 2024, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523 "2024-04-06T17:01:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jemano](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/aeb1de/32.png) [@Jemano](https://forum.snapmaker.com/u/Jemano)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523/1 "2024-04-06T17:01:02Z")

</div>

Hi everyone,

2 years ago, I engraved qrcodes on anodized aluminum cards. The result was neat and clean.

Today, the engraving is bad. The edges are all blurred.

 ![Design sans titre (2)](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/snapmaker/original/3X/1/4/14ea1acd3a4aa6813f867fb5a44758c4184131e9.jpeg)  
_upper left: 2 year ago, not blurred / upper right: today / below : toolpath from Luban_

**Settings tried**  
**Image formats tried:** PNG and JPG  
**Processing mode tried:** B&W and vector  
**Toolpath settings:** line-filled engraving and vector engraving  
**Line direction:** horizontal and vertical  
**Jog speed:** 1500 to 3000  
**Work speed:** 1500 to 3000  
**Constant Power mode:** on and off

The problem stay the same

I’m using a PNG image of a QRcode generated on the Internet. I’ve also tried using JPG images.

When Luban generates the laser trajectory, everything seems normal. But once the part is out of the Snapmaker, the result is really bad.

The aluminum card is fixed to the bed with the small pieces of silicone supplied with the Snapmaker.

Has anyone ever had this problem? If so, how did you solve it?

Thank you in advance for your answers

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xchrisd](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/forum.snapmaker.com/xchrisd/32/1503_2.png) [@xchrisd](https://forum.snapmaker.com/u/xchrisd)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 6:00pm UTC](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523/2 "2024-04-06T18:00:13Z")

</div>

Have a look at the pictures about over scanning and dot width compensation:

> [@Snapmaker Luban Downloads and Updates](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/snapmaker-luban-downloads-and-updates/4949/41):
>
> Nov 15, 2023, v4.10.1 Laser Parameter Additions Snapmaker Luban v4.10.0 updated the engraving parameters for pictures and graphics. With finely tuned parameters, intricate patterns and complex designs can now be engraved with greater accuracy. [image] Dot Width Compensation is able to optimize the toolpath based upon the size of the laser dot to reduce contour deformation and blurs. [image] Over Scanning is used to solve under and over burns from acceleration and deceleration phases. [imag…

If you do some testing it would be nice if you share your findings.

Anyway, your bed is not rising and falling at direction change and sits flat?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asg\_astro](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/forum.snapmaker.com/asg_astro/32/17728_2.png) [@asg\_astro](https://forum.snapmaker.com/u/asg_astro)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2025, 5:39pm UTC](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523/3 "2025-11-22T17:39:15Z")

</div>

Anyone ever know what the issue is here? I also had the same issue, 1-2 years ago, perfect laser engraving using the rotary on aluminum black anodized and those files are still perfect.

Now, I use the same png file and it comes out blurry.

I always chose vectorized and it turned a png into a filled image, now it’s doing an outline in luban and doesn’t work nearly as good. I run .05 line engraving at 2000-3000 line speeds and always been good.

I did try the new scan offset at .1, .2, .3, .4 and it’s not that, it just gets worse. Same with overscan testing.

The issue is how vectorizing a png used to work vs now… because my old .nc files work fine and come out perfect. I just can’t build anyting new now and trust it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simon\_Zhi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/forum.snapmaker.com/simon_zhi/32/30470_2.png) [@Simon\_Zhi](https://forum.snapmaker.com/u/Simon_Zhi)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2025, 12:14pm UTC](https://forum.snapmaker.com/t/10w-laser-on-anodized-aluminum-with-luban-4-11-blurred-edges/35523/4 "2025-11-23T12:14:54Z")

</div>

Here are a few possible causes I can think of for you to check:

(From what I understand, Snapmaker’s laser uses a semiconductor laser that basically needs no maintenance.)

1. Contamination on the laser-head mirror: smoke residue may be coating it (this affects focusing and changes the power. Swab the outermost glass in circles with a cotton tip dipped in alcohol.)

2. Your image resolution is too low (if you’ve already tried a high-resolution picture and it still comes out blurry, then this isn’t the issue.)

If it’s the first case, I suggest you run a power-scale matrix test before and after cleaning so you can compare and see if there’s a clear improvement.
